Jugueta v. Public Service Commission

G.R. No. L-12044 · 1959-05-20 · J. BENGZON, J.: · Primary: Commercial; Secondary: Remedial
REITERATION

Facts

1. The Antecedents: Silvestre Caparros & Co., operating the motorboat "LOLA VICTORINA," applied to the Public Service Commission for authority to charge specific passenger and freight rates for its sea route between Atimonan and Alabat Island, Quezon Province. Brigido Jugueta, Jose Angulo, and Jose Olaivar, who held certificates of public convenience for a ferry service on the same route, opposed this application. They contended that they were already providing adequate service, that Caparros & Co. lacked the necessary certificate and was operating illegally, and that there was no demand for an additional service. 2. Procedural History: The Public Service Commission provisionally approved the proposed rates on January 29, 1957, and scheduled a hearing. Prior to this hearing, on February 23, 1957, the petitioners filed a petition for certiorari with preliminary injunction before the Supreme Court, alleging grave abuse of discretion and excess of jurisdiction by the Commission. The Commission, in its appealed order, noted that the "LOLA VICTORINA" was licensed by the Bureau of Customs for bay and river business and stated that the applicant sought rate approval under Section 13(b) of the Public Service Act for interisland service, not a ferry service requiring a certificate. The Commission, referencing the Javellana case, concluded that the Atimonan-Alabat route was interisland, not ferry service, and thus its petition could be entertained. The petitioners' prior attempt to prevent Caparros & Co.'s operation via a preliminary injunction in a Quezon Province court was dissolved, a decision later sustained by the Supreme Court in a previous petition (G.R. L-11772). 3. The Petition: The petitioners argue that the Public Service Commission erred by not requiring Silvestre Caparros & Co. to obtain a certificate of public convenience and by permitting its operation in disregard of their existing certificates. They specifically contend that the water transportation between Atimonan and Alabat constitutes ferry service, not interisland shipping, and that the Commission wrongly applied the Javellana decision. The petitioners distinguish the circumstances of this case, particularly the distance and sea conditions, from those in Javellana. However, the Supreme Court reiterates that under Section 13(a) of the Public Service Law, the Commission has no authority to require motorships engaged in interisland or coastwise trade, including ferry service, to obtain certificates of public convenience, thus affirming that Caparros & Co. did not need a prior certificate.

Issue(s)

Whether the Public Service Commission has the authority to require a certificate of public convenience for a motorship or motorboat plying between the towns of Atimonan and Alabat Island.

Ruling

The petition is dismissed. The appealed order of the Public Service Commission is affirmed.

Ratio Decidendi

On Issue 1: The Supreme Court held that the Public Service Commission (PSC) did not err in following the precedent established in Javellana v. Commission (G.R. No. L-9088). The Court clarified that while the distance between Atimonan and Alabat (15 km) is shorter than that in Javellana (44 km), the distance alone is not the absolute minimum requirement for classifying a service as interisland. The body of water between the two points is not a small body of water connecting an interrupted highway, which is the traditional definition of a ferry service, but rather a crossing between islands. Under Section 13(a) of the Public Service Act (Commonwealth Act No. 146), the Commission is explicitly stripped of the authority to require steamboats, motorships, and steamship lines to obtain certificates of public convenience or to prescribe their definite routes. Applying this statutory mandate, the Court concluded that because the "LOLA VICTORINA" is a motorship, the PSC only has the authority to approve its rates under Section 13(b) and cannot require a certificate of public convenience for its operation. The Court reaffirmed that the Commission's technical judgment on the nature of the sea conditions and service must be accorded preponderant weight unless there is a clear error of law.

Main Doctrine

A motorboat service between two islands, even if the distance is relatively short, may be classified as interisland service rather than ferry service, depending on the surrounding conditions. Furthermore, under Section 13(a) of the Public Service Act, the Public Service Commission has no authority to require motorships to obtain certificates of public convenience.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →