Cosmic Lumber v. Manaois

G.R. No. L-12692 · 1960-01-30 · J. PADILLA, J.: · Primary: Commercial; Secondary: Civil
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: The plaintiff-appellee, Cosmic Lumber Company, Inc., sold and delivered hardware goods, lumber, and construction materials on credit to the defendant-appellant, Gapita Manaois, on various dates between November 10, 1952, and June 30, 1953. The total value of these goods amounted to P12,127.57. The appellant made partial payments totaling P6,979.83 between November 4, 1952, and March 10, 1954, and an additional P1,000 on December 23, 1954, after the original complaint was filed. Procedural History: The plaintiff-appellee filed an original complaint on March 24, 1954, seeking payment for the outstanding balance. The Court of First Instance of Pangasinan, Fourth Branch, rendered a judgment ordering the appellant to pay the plaintiff the sum of P4,147.74, plus lawful interest. The case was elevated to the Court of Appeals and subsequently transferred to the Supreme Court because it involved only a question of law. The Appeal: The defendant-appellant did not dispute receiving the goods or her outstanding indebtedness. However, she argued that since no time for payment was stipulated or fixed, and considering the nature and circumstances of the obligation, a period for payment should be inferred and fixed by the Court pursuant to Article 1197 of the new Civil Code.

Issue(s)

Whether the Court should fix a period for the payment of the appellant's outstanding obligation under Article 1197 of the Civil Code, given that no specific period was stipulated in the credit sales agreement. Whether the judgment of the Court of First Instance ordering the payment of P4,147.74 with interest is proper.

Ruling

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of First Instance with a modification regarding the period of payment. The appellant was ordered to pay the outstanding amount of P4,147.74 within fifteen (15) days from the date the judgment becomes final.

Ratio Decidendi

On Issue 1: The Court found that the parties intended to fix a period for payment in their credit sales contract, as evidenced by the stipulations in the invoices regarding interest on overdue accounts and the agreement to institute civil actions in the City of Dagupan. However, they failed to specify the exact number of days from the date of sale or delivery within which payment was due. Pursuant to Article 1197 of the Civil Code, which provides that courts may fix a period for the performance of an obligation if it can be inferred that a period was intended but not fixed, the Court determined it was appropriate to fix such a period. Considering that more than six to nearly seven years had already elapsed since the first and last sales, respectively, the Court deemed it necessary to set a definitive timeframe for the settlement of the debt. The appellant's failure to deny her obligation further supported the need for judicial intervention to establish a payment deadline. On Issue 2: The Court affirmed the lower court's judgment ordering the appellant to pay the outstanding balance of P4,147.74. This amount represented the remaining debt after accounting for all payments made by the appellant. The Court also upheld the imposition of lawful interest, although the specific rate and commencement date were implicitly confirmed by the affirmation of the lower court's judgment. The modification introduced by the Supreme Court pertained to the specific period within which the appellant must satisfy the judgment, mandating payment within fifteen (15) days from the finality of the decision, thereby ensuring the prompt resolution of the obligation.

Main Doctrine

The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision, ordering the defendant-appellant to pay the outstanding balance of P4,147.74. The Court applied Article 1197 of the Civil Code, finding that while the parties intended to fix a period for payment in their credit sales agreement, they failed to do so. Given the elapsed time since the sales were made, the Court fixed a period of fifteen (15) days from the finality of the judgment for the appellant to pay the debt.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →