Sorita v. Public Service Commission

G.R. No. L-20965 · 1966-10-29 · J. REGALA, J.: · Primary: Commercial; Secondary: Administrative Law
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: Respondent Angel Forneas filed an amended application with the Public Service Commission (PSC) for a certificate of public convenience to operate motorboat services for passengers and freight along the Cagayan River between Masical, Amulung and Tupang, Alcala, Cagayan. Procedural History: Petitioners, who were existing motorboat operators on the same route, opposed the application, arguing that Forneas lacked financial capacity and that their service was adequate. They also filed a motion to dismiss, asserting the PSC lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter under Section 13(a) of the Public Service Act. The Petition: The PSC denied the motion to dismiss and granted the certificate, finding Forneas qualified and the service necessary. Petitioners appealed, contending the PSC had no authority to issue certificates for motorboats of approximately 2.03 net tons, as these were not among the vessels exempted by Section 13(a) of the Public Service Act.

Issue(s)

Whether motorboat services for passenger and freight on navigable inland rivers require certificates of public convenience from the Public Service Commission under Commonwealth Act No. 146, as amended. Whether the Public Service Commission has jurisdiction to issue a certificate of public convenience for motorboats of approximately 2.03 net tons operating on inland rivers.

Ruling

The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Public Service Commission, holding that motorboats operating on inland rivers require a certificate of public convenience.

Ratio Decidendi

On whether motorboat services on navigable inland rivers require certificates of public convenience: The Court held that Section 13(a) of the Public Service Act, which exempts certain vessels from the requirement of a certificate of public convenience, specifically enumerates "steamboats, motorships and steamship lines." The Court distinguished these from the broader category of "pontines, ferries, and water craft" mentioned in Section 13(b). It reasoned that the law's particularity in specifying "steamboats, motorships and steamship lines" indicated an intent to exempt only vessels of considerable tonnage engaged in sea service, involving great distances and turbulent waters, as previously construed in Javellana, et al. v. Public Service Commission and Jugueta, et al. v. Public Service Commission. Motorboats and water crafts intended for inter-municipal transportation on inland rivers, like municipal rivers and channels, are incapable of navigating on the open sea and thus do not fall within the exempted class. Therefore, such vessels must secure a certificate of public convenience before operating as a common carrier. The Court reiterated its ruling in Municipality of Gattaran v. Elizaga, which held that a municipal ferry operator must obtain a certificate from the PSC. On whether the Public Service Commission has jurisdiction over motorboats of approximately 2.03 net tons operating on inland rivers: The Court concluded that based on the interpretation of Section 13(a) and 13(b) of the Public Service Act, motorboats of small tonnage, like the 2.03 net tons vessels in question, operating on inland municipal rivers, are not among the vessels exempted from the requirement of obtaining a certificate of public convenience. The exemption applies only to "steamboats, motorships and steamship lines" which are understood to be vessels of considerable tonnage for sea service. Consequently, the PSC has jurisdiction over such motorboat services. Furthermore, the Court noted that requiring such authorization serves public interest, as the Bureau of Customs lacks adequate agencies to oversee watercrafts on inland rivers, and the PSC's ability to enforce regulations for public safety and convenience is dependent on its power to grant and revoke certificates.

Main Doctrine

Motorboats and water crafts devoted to inter-municipal transportation service on inland water routes, such as municipal rivers, require a certificate of public convenience from the Public Service Commission, as they are distinct from the 'steamboats, motorships, and steamship lines' exempted by Section 13(a) of the Public Service Act, which refers to vessels of considerable tonnage engaged in sea service.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →