Land Bank of the Philippines v. Commission on Audit

G.R. Nos. 89679-81 · 1990-09-28 · J. MELENCIO-HERRERA, J.: · Primary: Commercial; Secondary: Taxation
NEW DOCTRINE

Facts

The Antecedents: The Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) issued Resolution No. 80-222, allowing for the condonation or reduction of penalty charges on past due loans under specific justifiable circumstances. Pursuant to this resolution, LBP waived penalty charges amounting to P9,636.36 on the loan of Home Savings Bank and Trust Company (HSBTC). Procedural History: LBP's Corporate Auditor questioned the waiver, referring the matter to the Commission on Audit (COA). The COA, in several decisions, disallowed the waiver, asserting its exclusive prerogative to compromise or release claims against the government under Section 36 of Presidential Decree No. 1445 (Government Auditing Code). The Petition: LBP filed a petition questioning the COA's decisions, arguing that its corporate charter grants it the power to condone claims, which, as a special law, should prevail over the general provisions of PD 1445.

Issue(s)

Whether the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) has the corporate power to waive penalty charges on loans. Whether the power to compromise or release claims against the government is exclusively vested in the Commission on Audit (COA) under Presidential Decree No. 1445.

Ruling

The Supreme Court set aside the decisions of the Commission on Audit insofar as they hold that the COA has the exclusive prerogative to settle and compromise liabilities to the Government concerning the Land Bank of the Philippines.

Ratio Decidendi

On the issue of LBP's power to waive penalty charges: The Court ruled in favor of LBP, holding that it possesses the corporate power to waive penalty charges. The Court reasoned that LBP, as a specialized banking institution created to provide financial support to agrarian reform, is vested with specific powers under its Charter (Republic Act No. 3844, as amended by Presidential Decree No. 251). Section 75 of its Charter explicitly grants LBP the authority to exercise general powers mentioned in the Corporation Law and the General Banking Act, insofar as they are not inconsistent with its decree. The General Banking Act, specifically Section 84, grants banking institutions the power to write off loans and advances, which the Court construed to include the lesser power to waive penalty charges on past due loans. This interpretation is supported by Central Bank Circular No. 958, Series of 1983, which vests the discretion for writing off loans in the Board of Directors of a bank. The Court emphasized that LBP's unique role and clientele necessitate flexibility in its operations to fulfill its objectives, and that waiving penalty charges, under specific, justifiable circumstances outlined in LBP Resolution No. 80-222, does not hamper its operations but rather aids in its mission. The Court also noted that the waiver pertained only to penalty charges, not the loan itself. On the exclusive prerogative of COA to compromise claims: The Court disagreed with the COA's assertion of exclusive prerogative. While acknowledging COA's general audit jurisdiction over government-owned or controlled corporations under Section 26 of PD 1445 and Article IX (D), Section 2(1) of the 1987 Constitution, the Court clarified that LBP, being a specialized banking institution, is not merely an ordinary "government agency" within the contemplation of Section 36 of PD 1445. The Court held that LBP's Charter, being a special law governing its specific functions and powers as a bank, should prevail over the general grant of authority to COA in PD 1445 concerning the compromise of claims related to LBP's banking operations. Therefore, the power to waive penalty charges, being an incident of its banking powers, is within LBP's authority, subject to COA's general audit jurisdiction to ensure fiscal responsibility.

Main Doctrine

The Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP), as a specialized banking institution, is authorized under its Charter to waive penalty charges on past due loans, as this power is implied from its authority to exercise general powers of banking institutions, including the power to write off loans and advances. This power is not exclusively vested in the Commission on Audit (COA) under Presidential Decree No. 1445.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →