Carlos v. Civil Service Commission

G.R. No. 105293 · 1993-12-07 · J. QUIASON, J.: · Primary: Labor; Secondary: Administrative Law
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: Petitioner Tomas B. Carlos was appointed as an Engineer of the Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) in 1976 and promoted to Supervising Civil Engineer in 1988. On September 19, 1988, the PPA General Manager filed an administrative complaint against petitioner and another employee with the Department of Transportation and Communication (DOTC) Secretary for dishonesty, conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service, and violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. Petitioner and the co-respondent were placed under preventive suspension on the same day. Procedural History: The DOTC Secretary rendered a decision on November 23, 1988, finding petitioner and his co-respondent guilty of dishonesty and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service. A motion for reconsideration was denied on August 3, 1989. Petitioner appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), which set aside the DOTC decision for lack of jurisdiction on March 25, 1991. The PPA General Manager, as complainant, appealed the MSPB decision to the Civil Service Commission (CSC). On October 25, 1991, the CSC, in Resolution No. 91-1314, reversed the MSPB decision and reinstated the DOTC Secretary's decision. Petitioner's motion for reconsideration was denied by the CSC in Resolution No. 92-534. The Petition: Petitioner filed an amended petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court and Article IX-A, Section 7 of the Constitution to nullify the CSC Resolutions.

Issue(s)

Whether the DOTC Secretary has original jurisdiction to discipline PPA employees below the rank of Assistant Manager. Whether petitioner is entitled to back wages.

Ruling

The Court reversed and set aside the questioned Resolutions of the Civil Service Commission. The Court held that the DOTC Secretary does not have original jurisdiction to discipline PPA employees below the rank of Assistant Manager, and that the PPA General Manager should conduct the investigation. The issue of back wages was remanded for further determination by the PPA, as the merits of the charges had not yet been ventilated.

Ratio Decidendi

On the jurisdiction of the DOTC Secretary: The Court reiterated its rulings in Beja v. Court of Appeals and Corona v. Court of Appeals, holding that under P.D. No. 857, the power to investigate PPA employees below the rank of Assistant Manager belongs to the PPA General Manager, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors. The DOTC Secretary's role is strictly appellate. The DOTC Secretary cannot initially investigate PPA personnel, as his jurisdiction is merely appellate. Therefore, the CSC resolutions, which upheld the DOTC Secretary's original jurisdiction, must be set aside. On the entitlement to back wages: The Court noted that the Solicitor General's position was that back wages should be withheld because the petitioner had not yet been cleared of the administrative charges. The petitioner countered that he had been cleared by the PPA and acquitted in a criminal case. However, the Court found no evidence on record of a PPA General Manager's decision dismissing the administrative complaint, nor a PPA Board of Directors' resolution approving such action. The acquittal in the criminal case of a co-respondent for violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act was not determinative of the administrative case, as the quantum of evidence required in administrative cases (preponderance of evidence) is less than that in criminal cases (proof beyond reasonable doubt). Thus, the petitioner's recourse lies with the PPA for the determination of the administrative charges and any entitlement to back wages.

Main Doctrine

The Department of Transportation and Communication (DOTC) Secretary does not have original jurisdiction to investigate and discipline employees of the Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) below the rank of Assistant Manager; this power belongs to the PPA General Manager, subject to the approval of the PPA Board of Directors. The DOTC Secretary's role is appellate.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →