Philippine Agricultural Commercial and Industrial Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Commission

G.R. No. 107994 · 1995-08-14 · J. KAPUNAN, J.: · Primary: Labor; Secondary:
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: Petitioner union, the exclusive bargaining agent of rank-and-file employees of respondent company, filed a complaint for the payment of 13th month pay for drivers and conductors compensated on a "purely commission" basis. The union argued that these employees are entitled to the basic minimum pay mandated by law if their commission is less than their basic minimum for eight hours of work. Procedural History: The Labor Arbiter dismissed the complaint. The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) dismissed the petitioner's appeal, and a subsequent motion for reconsideration was also denied. The Petition: The case reached the Supreme Court via a petition for certiorari seeking to reverse the NLRC decision.

Issue(s)

Whether the bus drivers and conductors of respondent Vallacar Transit, Inc. are entitled to 13th month pay. Whether employees compensated on a "purely commission" basis, but guaranteed a minimum wage, are entitled to 13th month pay.

Ruling

The petition is GRANTED. The decision of the National Labor Relations Commission is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The case is remanded to the Labor Arbiter for the proper computation of 13th month pay.

Ratio Decidendi

On the entitlement to 13th month pay for bus drivers and conductors: The Court reiterated that Presidential Decree No. 851 mandates the payment of 13th month pay to all employees receiving a basic salary of not more than P1,000.00 a month, regardless of the nature of employment. The Implementing Rules and Regulations define "basic salary" to include all remunerations or earnings paid by an employer for services rendered. Memorandum Order No. 28 clarified that all rank-and-file employees are entitled to 13th month pay. MOLE Explanatory Bulletin No. 86-12 explicitly states that employees paid a fixed or guaranteed wage plus commission are entitled to 13th month pay based on their total earnings, including both the fixed wage and commission. In sum, the 13th month pay of the bus drivers and conductors who are paid a fixed or guaranteed minimum wage in case their commissions are less than the statutory minimum, and commissions only when they exceed the statutory minimum, must be equivalent to one-twelfth (1/12) of their total earnings during the calendar year. On the entitlement to 13th month pay for employees compensated on a "purely commission" basis, but guaranteed a minimum wage: The Court found that while the company considered the drivers and conductors compensated on a commission basis, they were not paid purely by commission because they were automatically entitled to the basic minimum pay mandated by law if their earned commissions were less than their basic minimum for eight hours of work. This guaranteed minimum pay, even if contingent on commissions being insufficient, signifies that commissions form part of their wage or salary. A contrary interpretation would allow employers to evade the law by merely labeling the compensation scheme as "purely commission." The Court emphasized that the label attached to the remuneration is not controlling; rather, the nature of the remuneration and the purpose of the 13th month pay law are paramount. The Court referred to Article 97(f) of the Labor Code, which defines "wage" as remuneration or earnings, however designated, capable of being expressed in terms of money, whether fixed or ascertained on a time, task, piece, or commission basis. Applying this definition, the Court held that sales commissions earned by salesmen constitute part of their compensation or remuneration for services rendered, and thus part of their "wage" or "salary." The Court stressed that labor laws are enacted to protect the working class, and a narrow interpretation that allows employers to circumvent these laws through technicalities or labels is not in accord with the liberal spirit of labor legislation. The purpose of the 13th month pay law, as evident from its "WHEREAS" clauses, is to alleviate the plight of the working masses and protect their real wages from inflation. Misplaced legal hermeneutics should not be countenanced to evade paying employees what is due to them under the law.

Main Doctrine

Employees compensated on a commission basis who are also entitled to a fixed or guaranteed minimum wage are entitled to 13th month pay based on their total earnings, including commissions, as such commissions form part of their salary or wage.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →