Crismina Garments, Inc. v. Court of Appeals

G.R. No. 128721 · 1999-03-09 · J. PANGANIBAN, J.: · Primary: Civil; Secondary: Commercial
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: Crismina Garments, Inc. (petitioner) contracted Norma Siapno (respondent), a sole proprietress engaged in sewing garments, for the sewing of 20,762 pieces of assorted girls' denim pants. The total agreed payment for these services was P76,410.00. After delivery of the sewn pants, petitioner initially claimed some were defective but later indicated they were acceptable and promised payment. However, petitioner failed to pay the agreed amount. Respondent subsequently demanded payment, and petitioner later counter-alleged that 6,164 pairs were defective and demanded a refund of P49,925.51. Procedural History: Respondent filed a complaint with the trial court on January 8, 1981, seeking collection of the principal amount of P76,410.00. The trial court ruled in favor of the respondent, ordering petitioner to pay P76,140.00 with 12% interest per annum from the filing of the complaint, P5,000.00 for attorney's fees, and costs, while dismissing petitioner's counterclaim. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision regarding the principal amount and interest but deleted the award for attorney's fees. Petitioner's subsequent motion for reconsideration was denied. The Petition: Petitioner filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari with the Supreme Court, assailing the Court of Appeals' decision. Initially, the Supreme Court denied the petition. However, upon petitioner's motion for reconsideration, the Court reinstated the petition solely on the issue of the applicable interest rate. Petitioner argued that the interest should be computed at 6% per annum under Article 2209 of the Civil Code, as the obligation did not involve a loan or forbearance of money, goods, or credits, and there was no stipulation between the parties. The Court agreed with the petitioner, modifying the appellate court's decision to reflect a 6% interest rate from the filing of the complaint until finality of judgment, and 12% thereafter until full satisfaction.

Issue(s)

Whether the interest rate should be computed at twelve percent (12%) per annum for an obligation that does not involve a loan or forbearance of money in the absence of stipulation of the parties; specifically, whether Central Bank (CB) Circular No. 416, prescribing a twelve percent (12%) interest rate, applies. What is the applicable interest rate for a delayed payment arising from a contract for a piece of work, and from what point should the interest be computed.

Ruling

The Court ruled that the interest rate should be computed at six percent (6%) per annum. The appealed Decision was modified to reflect this, with the interest rate at six percent (6%) per annum from the filing of the Complaint until the finality of the judgment. Thereafter, if the judgment remains unpaid, the interest rate shall be twelve percent (12%) per annum from the time the judgment becomes final and executory until full satisfaction.

Ratio Decidendi

On the issue of the applicability of the twelve percent (12%) interest rate: The Court held that Central Bank (CB) Circular No. 416, which prescribes a twelve percent (12%) interest rate, applies specifically to loans or forbearance of money, goods, or credits, or judgments involving such. A "forbearance" in the context of the usury law refers to a contractual obligation of a lender or creditor to refrain from demanding repayment of a loan or debt that is due and payable. If the obligation does not arise from a loan or forbearance, the twelve percent (12%) interest rate does not apply. On the applicable interest rate for a delayed payment arising from a contract for a piece of work: The Court held that the interest rate should be six percent (6%) per annum. The obligation in this case arose from a contract for a piece of work, not from a loan or forbearance of money, goods, or credits. Therefore, Article 2209 of the Civil Code, which provides for a legal interest of six percent (6%) per annum in the absence of stipulation, governs. The Court reiterated the guidelines set in Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, distinguishing between obligations that are loans or forbearance of money (where 12% applies from default) and those that are not (where 6% applies from demand or judgment, depending on certainty of quantification). Since the amount due was established with reasonable certainty when the Complaint was filed, the six percent (6%) interest should be computed from the filing of the Complaint until the finality of the judgment. After finality, the rate becomes twelve percent (12%) per annum until satisfaction, as this period is deemed an equivalent to forbearance of credit.

Main Doctrine

The twelve percent (12%) interest rate under Central Bank Circular No. 416 applies only to loans or forbearance of money, goods, or credits, or to judgments involving such. For obligations arising from contracts for a piece of work, where payment is delayed, the legal interest rate of six percent (6%) per annum under Article 2209 of the Civil Code applies, unless otherwise stipulated.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →