People v. Bin

G.R. No. 12690 · 1917-09-27 · J. JOHNSON, J.: · Primary: Political; Secondary: Citizenship
REITERATION

Facts

1. The Antecedents: The case concerns the potential deportation of Lim Bin, a person of Chinese parentage born in Manila in 1882. He left the Philippines as a child and returned in 1898, intending to make the islands his home. The core dispute revolves around whether he, as a person born in the Philippines and having returned to reside there, is subject to deportation under Act No. 702, which required Chinese laborers to register. 2. Procedural History: The United States government initiated deportation proceedings against Lim Bin for failing to register as required by Act No. 702. The case proceeded to trial, where the facts regarding Lim Bin's birth in Manila, his parentage, his departure and return to the Philippines, and his minority status during the registration period were presented. The lower court found against Lim Bin, leading to his appeal to the Supreme Court. 3. The Petition: The appeal to the Supreme Court hinges on a single question: whether Lim Bin, a son of Chinese parents born in the Philippine Islands and residing there since 1898, can be deported as a Chinese laborer for failing to register under Act No. 702. The appellant argues that due to his birth in the Philippines and his intention to reside there, coupled with his minority status during the registration period, he should not be considered an alien subject to the registration and deportation provisions of the Act. The government did not present counter-arguments.

Issue(s)

Whether a person born in the Philippine Islands to Chinese parents, who returned and resided in the Philippines prior to its acquisition by the United States, and who was a minor during the period for registration under Act No. 702, is considered a Chinese alien subject to deportation for failure to register. Whether the provisions of Act No. 702 apply to minors.

Ruling

The judgment of the lower court is revoked, the complaint against the defendant is dismissed, and he is ordered to be set at liberty. The appellant is not required to register under Act No. 702 and therefore cannot be deported for his failure to do so.

Ratio Decidendi

On the issue of whether the appellant is a Chinese alien subject to deportation for failure to register under Act No. 702: The Court held that the appellant, having been born in the Philippine Islands and having established his home therein prior to the acquisition of the territory by the United States, was not intended by Congress or the Legislature of the Philippine Islands to be required to register as an alien under Act No. 702. The Court reasoned that while this conclusion might conflict with political laws under Spanish sovereignty, it aligns with the spirit of United States law, particularly the principle that persons born within the United States are citizens thereof, as established in Wong Kim Ark. The appellant's birth in the Philippines and his adoption of the islands as his home before the change in sovereignty were considered determinative factors. Furthermore, the Court noted that the appellant was a minor at the time of the enactment of Act No. 702 and during the registration period, and he did not reach his majority until after the registration period had terminated. The Court also referenced the Treaty of Paris, which brought the Philippine archipelago under United States territory while the appellant was still a minor. On the issue of whether Act No. 702 applies to minors: The Court concluded that it was not the intention of the Legislature to require minors to register in accordance with the provisions of Act No. 702, citing U.S. vs. Tan Chy Ho. This interpretation further supports the conclusion that the appellant, being a minor during the relevant period, was not subject to the registration requirement.

Main Doctrine

A person born in the Philippine Islands, who returned and established residence therein prior to its acquisition by the United States, and who was a minor at the time of the enactment of Act No. 702 and during the period for registration, is not considered a Chinese alien required to register under said Act and cannot be deported for failure to do so, especially if such person considers the Philippine Islands as their home.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →