People v. Lopez

G.R. No. 138648 · 2002-10-03 · J. QUISUMBING, J.: · Primary: Criminal; Secondary: Civil
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: On August 8, 1997, at approximately 6:30 PM, in Barangay B. del Mundo, Mansalay, Oriental Mindoro, Victor Lopez y Maning allegedly committed statutory rape against Cristina Gajisan, an eleven-year-old child. Procedural History: Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge. The prosecution presented evidence detailing the events: appellant lured Cristina to an uninhabited house, where he forcibly had carnal knowledge of her. Cristina reported the incident to her father, who brought her to the police and later to a doctor. A medico-legal examination revealed hematoma, lacerations of the hymen, and abrasions in the anus. The defense interposed denial and alibi, claiming appellant was at a neighbor's house playing cards during the time of the alleged offense. The Regional Trial Court of Oriental Mindoro, Branch 43, found appellant guilty of statutory rape and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua. The Petition: Appellant appealed the RTC decision, arguing that the victim's uncorroborated testimony was insufficient to prove consummated rape due to a lack of apodictic certainty regarding successful penile penetration.

Issue(s)

Whether the trial court correctly found the appellant guilty of consummated rape, specifically addressing the elements of the crime and the establishment of carnal knowledge. Whether the victim's testimony, corroborated by medical findings, was sufficient to establish carnal knowledge, and whether the appellant's defense was credible in light of the evidence.

Ruling

The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision finding appellant Victor Lopez y Maning guilty beyond reasonable doubt of statutory rape, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua. The Court modified the award by ordering the appellant to pay additional moral damages of P50,000.00 and exemplary damages of P25,000.00, in addition to the civil indemnity of P50,000.00.

Ratio Decidendi

On the issue of consummated rape: The Court reiterated that under Article 335, paragraph 3 of the Revised Penal Code, the elements of statutory rape are (1) carnal knowledge of a woman and (2) the woman being under twelve (12) years of age. Mere sexual congress with a child under twelve years of age consummates the crime, irrespective of consent or the application of force or intimidation, as the law presumes a child of such tender age lacks the capacity to give intelligent consent. The victim's testimony, described as straightforward and candid, detailed the painful sensation of penetration and the discharge of a sticky substance. This testimony was corroborated by the medico-legal report of Dr. Mayflor C. Tirador, which found abrasions on the victim's anus and lacerations on her hymen, indicating forcible penetration. The Court found the appellant's contention that penetration was not established as absurd and ridiculous, given the victim's clear narration and the medical findings. Therefore, both elements of the crime were duly proved, establishing consummated statutory rape. On the sufficiency of the victim's testimony and corroboration: The Court emphasized the long-settled rule that a victim's testimony of rape, if credible, is sufficient for conviction. The Court reasoned that a young, innocent girl would have no motive to fabricate a story of sexual abuse, undergo examination, and publicly disclose such an ordeal unless it were true. The victim's positive identification of the appellant as her abuser, coupled with her detailed account of the sexual act, was found to be credible and truthful. This testimony was further bolstered by the medico-legal findings, which confirmed the physical evidence of penetration. Consequently, the denial and alibi presented by the appellant were deemed weak and unworthy of credit when weighed against the victim's credible testimony and the corroborating medical evidence.

Main Doctrine

The crime of statutory rape is consummated by mere sexual congress with a woman under twelve (12) years of age, regardless of her consent or lack thereof. The victim's testimony, if credible, is sufficient for conviction, and it is corroborated by medical findings of penetration.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →