People v. Feliciano

G.R. No. 1445 · 1904-03-17 · J. ARELLANO, J.: · Primary: Criminal; Secondary: Remedial
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: The accused were charged with robbery en cuadrilla for assaulting the shop of Chinamen Oa-Chio and Si-Cuingco on the night of May 25, 1903. The accused, numbering more than three and armed with guns, revolvers, and knives, allegedly took money and jewels from the store for the purpose of gain, employing intimidation and force. Procedural History: The trial court convicted the defendants of robbery en cuadrilla, with the aggravating circumstance of nocturnity, sentencing each to ten years of presidio mayor. The defendants appealed this decision. The Petition: The defendants appealed the decision of the trial court.

Issue(s)

Whether the crime committed was robbery en cuadrilla or brigandage. Whether the aggravating circumstance of nocturnity was correctly applied.

Ruling

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, finding the defendants guilty of robbery en cuadrilla with the aggravating circumstance of nocturnity, and sentencing each to ten years of presidio mayor. The Court also imposed the obligation to return the stolen money and property, with costs.

Ratio Decidendi

On whether the crime committed was robbery en cuadrilla or brigandage: The Court held that the crime committed was robbery en cuadrilla. The facts proved that the five defendants, inhabitants of the town where the robbery occurred, acted together for the specific purpose of robbing the store. They did not constitute a known band of brigands, and their agreement was limited to the commission of this particular crime. This aligns with the definition of robbery en cuadrilla under Article 505 of the Penal Code, rather than brigandage, which typically involves organized bands. The Court cited the Penal Code provisions for robbery en cuadrilla and the corresponding penalties. On whether the aggravating circumstance of nocturnity was correctly applied: The Court found no error in the trial court's determination that the offense was committed with the aggravating circumstance of nocturnity. The facts established that the robbery occurred at 11 o'clock at night. The Penal Code considers nocturnity as an aggravating circumstance when the offense is committed under the cover of darkness, which facilitates its execution and hinders the victim's defense. The Court affirmed the application of this circumstance as found by the lower court.

Main Doctrine

The crime of robbery en cuadrilla is committed when more than three armed individuals, acting in concert for the purpose of gain, assault a place and take property through force and intimidation. The aggravating circumstance of nocturnity applies when the offense is committed at night.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →