People v. Gallardo

G.R. No. 238748 · 2019-03-18 · J. PERLAS-BERNABE, J.: · Primary: Criminal; Secondary: Remedial
REVERSAL

Facts

The Antecedents: The accused-appellant, Edgar Gallardo y Barrios, was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of three (3) counts of Qualified Rape by the Court of Appeals (CA). The Supreme Court, in a Resolution dated November 19, 2018, affirmed the CA's decision. Procedural History: The accused-appellant filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Supreme Court's Resolution. However, during the pendency of this motion, the Bureau of Corrections informed the Court of the accused-appellant's death on February 19, 2019. The Petition: The accused-appellant's death prior to final conviction necessitated a reconsideration of the Supreme Court's previous Resolution.

Issue(s)

Whether the criminal cases against the accused-appellant should be dismissed due to his death prior to final conviction. Whether the civil liability ex delicto is extinguished by the death of the accused prior to final conviction. Whether a separate civil action can be pursued for civil liabilities arising from sources other than the offense committed.

Ruling

The Court resolved to set aside its Resolution dated November 19, 2018, and to dismiss the criminal cases against Edgar Gallardo y Barrios by reason of his death. The case was declared closed and terminated.

Ratio Decidendi

On the dismissal of criminal cases due to death: The Court reiterated the prevailing law and jurisprudence that the death of an accused prior to final conviction renders the criminal cases dismissible. This is explicitly provided for under Article 89(1) of the Revised Penal Code, which states that criminal liability is totally extinguished by the death of the accused. The Court emphasized that once the accused dies, there is no longer a defendant to stand as the accused in the criminal proceedings, thus necessitating the dismissal of the cases. On the extinguishment of civil liability ex delicto: Citing People v. Culas, the Court explained that the death of the accused pending appeal of his conviction extinguishes not only his criminal liability but also the civil liability based solely on the offense committed, referred to as civil liability ex delicto in senso strictiore. This means that the civil liability that directly arises from and is based solely on the crime charged is extinguished upon the death of the offender before final judgment. On the survival of other civil liabilities: The Court clarified that while civil liability ex delicto is extinguished, the claim for civil liability may survive if it can be predicated on a source of obligation other than the delict. Article 1157 of the Civil Code enumerates these other sources, including law, contracts, quasi-contracts, and quasi-delicts. If the civil liability has another basis, a separate civil action may be pursued against the estate of the deceased accused, subject to the rules on procedure and the applicable law.

Main Doctrine

The death of an accused prior to final conviction extinguishes both criminal liability and civil liability ex delicto. However, civil liability arising from other sources of obligation may survive and be pursued in a separate civil action against the estate of the deceased.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →