Pastrana v. Bahia Shipping Services

G.R. No. 227419 · 2020-06-10 · J. CAGUIOA, J.: · Primary: Labor; Secondary: Remedial
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: Petitioner Henry Espiritu Pastrana (Pastrana) was employed as an Environmental Team Leader on board a vessel. While working, he experienced lower back pain that radiated to his right leg after lifting a heavy bin. He was repatriated to the Philippines for medical treatment. Procedural History: Pastrana reported to the company-designated physician, Dr. Robert Lim (Dr. Lim), who diagnosed him with Herniated Disc, L4-L5, L5-S1 and issued a Grade 11 disability rating, offering $7,000.00. Pastrana sought a second opinion from his personal doctor, who declared him permanently unfit. Pastrana filed a complaint for total and permanent disability benefits. The Labor Arbiter (LA) ruled in favor of Pastrana, awarding $60,000.00 plus attorney's fees. The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) affirmed the LA's decision. The Court of Appeals (CA) granted the respondents' petition for certiorari, setting aside the NLRC ruling and ordering Pastrana to return the awarded amount, holding him entitled only to partial disability benefits corresponding to Grade 11. The Petition: Pastrana filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari, assailing the CA's decision and arguing that the CA erred in reversing the NLRC and holding him entitled only to partial disability benefits.

Issue(s)

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the National Labor Relations Commission and holding that Pastrana is only entitled to partial disability benefit. Whether the company-designated physician issued a final medical assessment within the prescribed period.

Ruling

The Petition is GRANTED. The Decision and Resolution of the Court of Appeals are ANNULLED and SET ASIDE. The Decision of the Labor Arbiter is REINSTATED, ordering the respondents to pay Pastrana USD60,000.00 or its equivalent in Philippine Currency, representing his permanent and total disability benefits, plus attorney's fees equivalent to 10% of the total judgment award.

Ratio Decidendi

On the issue of whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the National Labor Relations Commission and holding that Pastrana is only entitled to partial disability benefit: The Court found merit in the petition, reversing the CA's decision. The Court reiterated the established rules governing a seafarer's entitlement to disability benefits, emphasizing the importance of the company-designated physician's final medical assessment within the prescribed periods. The Court noted that the CA's finding that the company-designated physician issued a disability assessment on April 11, 2013, was a factual finding that the Supreme Court generally does not disturb. However, the Court proceeded to analyze the timeliness of this assessment. On the issue of whether the company-designated physician issued a final medical assessment within the prescribed period: The Court found that the company-designated physician, Dr. Lim, failed to issue a final disability assessment within the mandated 120-day period from Pastrana's repatriation. Pastrana was repatriated on December 10, 2012, and reported to Dr. Lim on December 12, 2012. The final assessment was issued on April 11, 2013, which is 122 days after repatriation, thus exceeding the 120-day period. The Court found no sufficient justification on record to warrant the extension of the period to 240 days, as there was no indication that further medical treatment was needed or intended. Consequently, Dr. Lim's failure to issue a timely assessment rendered his opinion irrelevant, and Pastrana is conclusively presumed to be suffering from permanent and total disability. The Court reinstated the Labor Arbiter's award of permanent and total disability benefits.

Main Doctrine

The failure of the company-designated physician to issue a final and definitive disability assessment within the 120-day period (or 240 days if justified) from the seafarer's repatriation renders the seafarer conclusively presumed to be suffering from permanent and total disability, entitling them to the corresponding benefits.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →