Rivera v. Commission on Elections

G.R. No. 210273 and G.R. No. 213069 · 2016-04-19 · J. REYES, J.: · Primary: Political; Secondary: Remedial
REITERATION

Facts

The Antecedents: Citizens' Battle Against Corruption (CIBAC) was registered as a multi-sectoral party-list in 2001. For the May 2013 elections, two factions claimed authority to nominate representatives: the group led by Emmanuel Joel Villanueva (CIBAC National Council) and the group led by Maria Blanca Kim Bernardo-Lokin (CIBAC Foundation). The National Council submitted a list including Sherwin N. Tugna and Cinchona C. Cruz-Gonzales, while the Foundation submitted a list including Luis K. Lokin, Jr. and Bibiano C. Rivera. The Foundation argued that the National Council had become defunct and was replaced by the Board of Trustees (BOT) of the SEC-registered CIBAC Foundation. Procedural History: The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) issued National Board of Canvassers (NBOC) Resolution No. 0011-13, recognizing the nominees of the CIBAC National Council. CIBAC was proclaimed a winner, and Tugna and Gonzales were sworn in and assumed office in the 16th Congress. The COMELEC subsequently ruled as moot the manifestation for proclamation filed by Luis K. Lokin, Jr. in NBOC Resolution No. 0013-13. The Petition: Rivera and Lokin filed a petition for certiorari (G.R. No. 210273) to nullify the COMELEC resolutions, while CIBAC Foundation filed a petition for quo warranto (G.R. No. 213069) against the CIBAC National Council. Petitioners argued that the SEC-registered foundation was the true entity that participated in previous elections and that the National Council lost its legal existence. They relied on previous cases like the consolidated Lokin case and Amores v. HRET to support their claim of legitimacy.

Issue(s)

Whether the CIBAC National Council has been replaced by the Board of Trustees of the SEC-registered CIBAC Foundation for purposes of nominating party-list representatives. Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to entertain a petition for quo warranto against proclaimed members of the House of Representatives who have already assumed office.

Ruling

The petitions are DISMISSED.

Ratio Decidendi

On Issue 1: The Court held that the leadership dispute was already settled with finality under the doctrine of res judicata by conclusiveness of judgment. In the 2012 case of Lokin, Jr. v. COMELEC, the Court explicitly ruled that the CIBAC National Council is the governing body authorized to nominate representatives, not the CIBAC Foundation. The registration of CIBAC Foundation with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) does not substitute for the evidentiary requirement to show that nominees are bona fide members of the party-list registered with the Commission on Elections (COMELEC). The National Council, as the governing body under the party's Constitution and By-Laws, remains the only entity empowered to formulate policies and authorize participation in elections. Petitioners failed to provide new evidence of the affiliation of the Foundation's Board of Trustees to the COMELEC-registered sectoral party. Therefore, the National Council has not become defunct or replaced by the SEC-registered entity. On Issue 2: The Court ruled that it lacks jurisdiction over the quo warranto petition because the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) is the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of its Members. Applying the doctrine in Reyes v. COMELEC, the HRET's jurisdiction begins once a winning candidate has been proclaimed, taken the oath, and assumed office. Since respondents Tugna and Gonzales had already been proclaimed, taken their oaths, and assumed their seats in the 16th Congress, the COMELEC's jurisdiction ended and the HRET's jurisdiction became exclusive. A petition for quo warranto filed in the Supreme Court is the improper remedy once these three conditions for membership in the House of Representatives are met. Consequently, G.R. No. 213069 must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Main Doctrine

The jurisdiction of the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) over election contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of a Member of the House of Representatives begins only after the winning candidate has been proclaimed, taken his oath, and assumed office. Prior to the concurrence of these three events, the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) retains jurisdiction. Additionally, the governing body of a party-list organization registered with the COMELEC (e.g., a National Council) cannot be replaced or deemed defunct simply by the registration of a separate foundation with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as the latter is a distinct legal entity that does not automatically inherit the political rights of the registered party-list.

Access audio review, related cases, codal links, and more.

Open LexMatePH →